ISSN 2283 - 7949

logo
Glocalism: Journal of culture, politics and innovation
logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Call for papers
  • Issues
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES - Other Essays

Iran and the Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Diplomacy or Revisionism?

Home ISSUES ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES - Other Essays Iran and the Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Diplomacy or Revisionism?
Ottobre 6, 2020 by Debasish Das in ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES - Other Essays
  • Abstract
  • Content
  • DOI

Abstract

Abstract: The assassination of Major General Qasem Soleimani by the US, followed by the downing of the Ukrainian passenger jet by the Iranian forces have raised several questions on the credibility of Iranian claims over its nuclear program once again. Amid the provocation, the declaration of suspension of all limits to uranium enrichment under the 2015 nuclear deal has been the major bargaining point for Iran to retain its position. In response, the E3 (France, Germany and the UK) has triggered the Dispute Resolution Mechanism under paragraph 36 of the 2015 nuclear deal. The mechanism offers a 60-day window to Iran to seek a mutually beneficial resolution aiming to resume its conformation to the deal. Failure to secure the resolution shall resume UNSC sanctions. This article deals with the strategy of coercive diplomacy between the West and Iran through the recent episodes of violent exchanges as well as diplomatic discourses along the lines of their historical relevance. It argues that the West has shifted its focus from clear coercive diplomacy to coercive revisionism, which entails a consistent effort to defy mutuality of the outcome. Perhaps, it seeks an arbitrary outcome in favor of the West. It attempts to address the plausibility of the Dispute Resolution Mechanism.

Keywords: Dispute Resolution Mechanism, JCPoA, NPT, coercive diplomacy, coercive revisionism.

 

DOWNLOAD PDF

Content

DOWNLOAD PDF
Das_gjcpi_2020_2

DOI

DOI: 10.12893/gjcpi.2020.2.3

About the author

Debasish Das
deb_das07@live.in

Central University of Kerala (India)

1
Recommend
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIN
Share
Tagged in

Search

CFP

CFP 2021, 2: THE GLOCAL WORLD OF HISTORICAL ARCHIVES
CFP 2021, 2: THE GLOCAL WORLD OF HISTORICAL ARCHIVES
Gennaio 8, 2021 by Glocalism in CALL FOR PAPERS
Share
CFP 2021, 1: NEW GLOCAL FORMS OF FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AND REVENUE MOBILIZATION
CFP 2021, 1: NEW GLOCAL FORMS OF FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION AND REVENUE MOBILIZATION
Ottobre 5, 2020 by Glocalism in CALL FOR PAPERS
Share
CONTACT US HERE
delimiter image
Published by

Milan, Italy

ISSN 2283-7949

Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation

Except where otherwise noted,

content on this site is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Privacy Policy

Follow us on Academia.edu
Follow us on Twitter

Glocalism JournalFollow

Glocalism Journal
Retweet on TwitterGlocalism Journal Retweeted
ATPLCromaATPLCroma@ATPLCroma·
4h

On the occasion of International Women's Day: Exploring #LorellaCedroni's diary in the Historical Archives of the European Union @EuropeanUni | https://sway.office.com/iYJAqqZEOOzj41D2?ref=Twitter&loc=endofstory

Reply on Twitter 1368882469815123968Retweet on Twitter 13688824698151239681Like on Twitter 13688824698151239681Twitter 1368882469815123968
Retweet on TwitterGlocalism Journal Retweeted
timeshigheredTimes Higher Education@timeshighered·
5 Mar

We can’t teach in a technological dystopia: Andy Farnell says the pandemic brought out the best in teaching staff, but countervailing forces are stamping out their creativity – and portend nightmare scenarios of surveillance and disempowerment
https://bit.ly/3bd4tet

Reply on Twitter 1367848131396857858Retweet on Twitter 13678481313968578582Like on Twitter 13678481313968578583Twitter 1367848131396857858
logo