ISSN 2283 - 7949

logo
Glocalism: Journal of culture, politics and innovation
logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Call for papers
  • Issues
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES - Other Essays

Iran and the Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Diplomacy or Revisionism?

Home ISSUES ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES - Other Essays Iran and the Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Diplomacy or Revisionism?
Ottobre 6, 2020 by Debasish Das in ISSUE 2020, 2: GLOBALIZATION, MARKET AND ECONOMIC POLICIES - Other Essays
  • Abstract
  • Content
  • DOI

Abstract

Abstract: The assassination of Major General Qasem Soleimani by the US, followed by the downing of the Ukrainian passenger jet by the Iranian forces have raised several questions on the credibility of Iranian claims over its nuclear program once again. Amid the provocation, the declaration of suspension of all limits to uranium enrichment under the 2015 nuclear deal has been the major bargaining point for Iran to retain its position. In response, the E3 (France, Germany and the UK) has triggered the Dispute Resolution Mechanism under paragraph 36 of the 2015 nuclear deal. The mechanism offers a 60-day window to Iran to seek a mutually beneficial resolution aiming to resume its conformation to the deal. Failure to secure the resolution shall resume UNSC sanctions. This article deals with the strategy of coercive diplomacy between the West and Iran through the recent episodes of violent exchanges as well as diplomatic discourses along the lines of their historical relevance. It argues that the West has shifted its focus from clear coercive diplomacy to coercive revisionism, which entails a consistent effort to defy mutuality of the outcome. Perhaps, it seeks an arbitrary outcome in favor of the West. It attempts to address the plausibility of the Dispute Resolution Mechanism.

Keywords: Dispute Resolution Mechanism, JCPoA, NPT, coercive diplomacy, coercive revisionism.

 

DOWNLOAD PDF

Content

DOWNLOAD PDF
Das_gjcpi_2020_2

DOI

DOI: 10.12893/gjcpi.2020.2.3

About the author

Debasish Das
deb_das07@live.in

Central University of Kerala (India)

1
Recommend
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIN
Share
Tagged in

Search

CFP

CFP 2023, 2: LONGEVITY AND GLOBALISATION
CFP 2023, 2: LONGEVITY AND GLOBALISATION
Febbraio 13, 2023 by Glocalism in CALL FOR PAPERS
Share
CFP 2023, 1: ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS, MIGRATION, AND SOCIAL POLICY
CFP 2023, 1: ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS, MIGRATION, AND SOCIAL POLICY
Ottobre 5, 2022 by Glocalism in CALL FOR PAPERS
Share
CONTACT US HERE
delimiter image
Published by

Milan, Italy

ISSN 2283-7949

Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation

CC-BY_icon

Except where otherwise noted,

content on this site is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Privacy Policy

Follow us on Academia.edu
Follow us on Twitter

Glocalism Journal Follow

A peer-reviewed, open-access and cross-disciplinary journal published every four months by the association “Globus et Locus”

GlocalismJ
glocalismj Glocalism Journal @glocalismj ·
17 Mar

CALL FOR PAPERS GJ | 2023,2: Longevity and Globalisation. Deadline: May 31, 2023. Read more on our website 👉🏼https://glocalismjournal.org/cfp-2023-2-longevity-and-globalisation/

Reply on Twitter 1636722917173067780 Retweet on Twitter 1636722917173067780 1 Like on Twitter 1636722917173067780 Twitter 1636722917173067780
Retweet on Twitter Glocalism Journal Retweeted
global_policy Global Policy @global_policy ·
14 Mar

Why do some states employ digital repression and not others? https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/14/03/2023/why-do-some-states-employ-digital-repression-and-not-others

Reply on Twitter 1635579919102091264 Retweet on Twitter 1635579919102091264 1 Like on Twitter 1635579919102091264 1 Twitter 1635579919102091264
logo